Максим Вихров, главный редактор журнала "Украинская неделя". Социолог-недоучка, так и не закончивший аспирантуру в Луганске. Типичный пример вчерашнего еретика («східняк» - это же пожизненное клеймо, литератор Юрий Прохасько не даст соврать), ставшего самым жестоким инквизитором.
Максим Вихров, главный редактор журнала "Украинская неделя". Социолог-недоучка, так и не закончивший аспирантуру в Луганске. Типичный пример вчерашнего еретика («східняк» - это же пожизненное клеймо, литератор Юрий Прохасько не даст соврать), ставшего самым жестоким инквизитором.
The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from es
