Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 10 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8202 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Андрей Медведев | Telegram Webview: MedvedevVesti/19702 -
Вообще, стоит посмотреть крайне внимательно, какое решение примет суд.
Это своего рода маркер, действительно ли у нас что-то меняется в миграционной сфере, или по-прежнему диаспоры способны "по-братски порешать вопросы". Своего рода краш-тест этот судебный процесс.
Потому что, если по закону, то Джиянову светит реальный срок в колонии. Вот и посмотрим.
Вообще, стоит посмотреть крайне внимательно, какое решение примет суд.
Это своего рода маркер, действительно ли у нас что-то меняется в миграционной сфере, или по-прежнему диаспоры способны "по-братски порешать вопросы". Своего рода краш-тест этот судебный процесс.
Потому что, если по закону, то Джиянову светит реальный срок в колонии. Вот и посмотрим.
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from es