Закрытый чат для постоянных жертвователей оперативно собрал 40.000 для русского добровольца, которому нужны плиты для бронежилета и шлем. Их я завтра приобрету и вышлю.
Вступить легко - @savva_fedoseev Ежемесячный взнос от 1000 рублей.
Закрытый чат для постоянных жертвователей оперативно собрал 40.000 для русского добровольца, которому нужны плиты для бронежилета и шлем. Их я завтра приобрету и вышлю.
Вступить легко - @savva_fedoseev Ежемесячный взнос от 1000 рублей.
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from es
