А есть ещё продажные учёные, которым в своё время купили звания академиков за оказанные услуги добытчикам природных ресурсов. Теперь они вдруг вспомнили про мнение народа. Опять желания толстосумов прячут за нужды населения. С каким остервенением идет обработка мозгов общественности!
А есть ещё продажные учёные, которым в своё время купили звания академиков за оказанные услуги добытчикам природных ресурсов. Теперь они вдруг вспомнили про мнение народа. Опять желания толстосумов прячут за нужды населения. С каким остервенением идет обработка мозгов общественности!
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so.
from es