Гайз, трохи непонятної інфи про гурт Аnd One, а точніше про Стіва Нагаві. Наткнулась на дуже дивні пости в його твітері, контекст яких не сильно зрозумілий мені, навіть із перекладом. Буду дуже вдячна, якщо хтось допоможе розібратися(??), бо пости виглядають дивно по відношенню до України, тож тепер я більше сумніваюсь про його позицію
Гайз, трохи непонятної інфи про гурт Аnd One, а точніше про Стіва Нагаві. Наткнулась на дуже дивні пости в його твітері, контекст яких не сильно зрозумілий мені, навіть із перекладом. Буду дуже вдячна, якщо хтось допоможе розібратися(??), бо пости виглядають дивно по відношенню до України, тож тепер я більше сумніваюсь про його позицію
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from es
