🇺🇦 Опис: Штурмовики ЗСУ з окопів спостерігають, як танк Leopard 2A6 працює під ворожим артилерійським обстрілом. Поблизу села Роботине, Запорізька область.
🇬🇧 Description: Ukrainian assault troops observe from the trenches as a Leopard 2A6 tank operates under enemy artillery fire. Near the village of Robotyne, Zaporizhzhia region.
🇺🇦 Опис: Штурмовики ЗСУ з окопів спостерігають, як танк Leopard 2A6 працює під ворожим артилерійським обстрілом. Поблизу села Роботине, Запорізька область.
🇬🇧 Description: Ukrainian assault troops observe from the trenches as a Leopard 2A6 tank operates under enemy artillery fire. Near the village of Robotyne, Zaporizhzhia region.
"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from es
