Если самоназванная «охранота» обвиняется в судах Российской Федерации по Статье 20.3.1. КоАП РФ «Возбуждение ненависти либо вражды, а равно унижение человеческого достоинства», то работает она, скорее всего, на интересы сопредельного бывшего государства «Украина» и против Государства Российского.
А обвиняющие её – это прокуроры Прокуратуры Российской Федерации.
Политология для взрослых. ________________________ ККН™, служба очистки Рунета от tg-отбросов, подпишись! Связь с редакцией - наш бот.
Если самоназванная «охранота» обвиняется в судах Российской Федерации по Статье 20.3.1. КоАП РФ «Возбуждение ненависти либо вражды, а равно унижение человеческого достоинства», то работает она, скорее всего, на интересы сопредельного бывшего государства «Украина» и против Государства Российского.
А обвиняющие её – это прокуроры Прокуратуры Российской Федерации.
Политология для взрослых. ________________________ ККН™, служба очистки Рунета от tg-отбросов, подпишись! Связь с редакцией - наш бот.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips.
from es
