В продолжение истории про наличие в модели угроз реальной опасности захвата здания. Подписчик, за что ему спасибо, прислал фотографию. "О времена, о нравы..." ⚔️
Интересно, можно ли это рассматривать как средство гарантированного уничтожения информации? 🤔 Думаю, результат зависит от размера серверной 😊
В продолжение истории про наличие в модели угроз реальной опасности захвата здания. Подписчик, за что ему спасибо, прислал фотографию. "О времена, о нравы..." ⚔️
Интересно, можно ли это рассматривать как средство гарантированного уничтожения информации? 🤔 Думаю, результат зависит от размера серверной 😊
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from es
