Подросток запустил салют на школьной дискотеке в Артёме.
Фейерверк на новогодней пати решил устроить ученик общеобразовательной № 17. На улицу выходить не стал. Результат: разбитое окно и беспорядок. Пострадавших, к счастью, нет. Пиромана уже ищут, подсчитывают ущерб.
Подросток запустил салют на школьной дискотеке в Артёме.
Фейерверк на новогодней пати решил устроить ученик общеобразовательной № 17. На улицу выходить не стал. Результат: разбитое окно и беспорядок. Пострадавших, к счастью, нет. Пиромана уже ищут, подсчитывают ущерб.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from es
