📵Thüringer Chaos: Hat das System Angst vor Zeugen?
Nach AUF1-Informationen ist den Besuchern auf der überfüllten Zuschauertribüne im Thüringer Landtag streng verboten, ihre Handys zu verwenden. Die Demokratie-Simulation von Erfurt soll offenbar so weit wie möglich verheimlicht werden.
📸Unsere Reporterin kämpft sich soeben in den Plenarsaal und liefert in Kürze erste Eindrücke mit Bild- und Videomaterial.
📵Thüringer Chaos: Hat das System Angst vor Zeugen?
Nach AUF1-Informationen ist den Besuchern auf der überfüllten Zuschauertribüne im Thüringer Landtag streng verboten, ihre Handys zu verwenden. Die Demokratie-Simulation von Erfurt soll offenbar so weit wie möglich verheimlicht werden.
📸Unsere Reporterin kämpft sich soeben in den Plenarsaal und liefert in Kürze erste Eindrücke mit Bild- und Videomaterial.
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from es
