Внимание, ответ! (Для тех, кто не заглянул в комментарии) 🎬 1. Красавица и чудовище 🎬 2. 12 друзей Оушена 🎬 3. Из 13 в 30 🎬 4. Волк с Уолл-стрит 🎬 5. Властелин колец 🎬 6. Бегущий по лезвию
Внимание, ответ! (Для тех, кто не заглянул в комментарии) 🎬 1. Красавица и чудовище 🎬 2. 12 друзей Оушена 🎬 3. Из 13 в 30 🎬 4. Волк с Уолл-стрит 🎬 5. Властелин колец 🎬 6. Бегущий по лезвию
BY Ирландия. Синеокий взгляд
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from es
