🏴☠️🇺🇦Полицаи накинулись на отца находящегося на фронте солдата ВСУ и запаковали его для отправки на бессмысленную войну Зеленского В Камень-Каширском Волынской области пьяные военкомы «прыгали через забор» во двор дома, где сын служит на фронте, сообщает женщина на видео.
Потом подключились полицаи, мужчина (отец военного) сопротивлялся, его повалили на землю, надели наручники и посадили в машину.
🏴☠️🇺🇦Полицаи накинулись на отца находящегося на фронте солдата ВСУ и запаковали его для отправки на бессмысленную войну Зеленского В Камень-Каширском Волынской области пьяные военкомы «прыгали через забор» во двор дома, где сын служит на фронте, сообщает женщина на видео.
Потом подключились полицаи, мужчина (отец военного) сопротивлялся, его повалили на землю, надели наручники и посадили в машину.
In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. "Markets were cheering this economic recovery and return to strong economic growth, but the cheers will turn to tears if the inflation outbreak pushes businesses and consumers to the brink of recession," he added. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from es
