🇷🇺🛩️Полет российского разведывательного беспилотникапрямо над Одессой
Аналогичным образом беспилотники летают также над Запорожьем, Харьковом и прочими населенным пунктами других ближайших областей Украины, выявляя цели для оперативного нанесения ударов и осуществляя объективный контроль.
🇷🇺🛩️Полет российского разведывательного беспилотникапрямо над Одессой
Аналогичным образом беспилотники летают также над Запорожьем, Харьковом и прочими населенным пунктами других ближайших областей Украины, выявляя цели для оперативного нанесения ударов и осуществляя объективный контроль.
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from es
