📸🇨🇳Владимир Путин осмотрел экспозицию VIII Российско-Китайского ЭКСПО
Выставка проходит в Харбине с 17 по 21 мая.Традиционно включает в себя масштабную выставочную зону, где представлены стенды российских и китайских компаний, экспозиции субъектов Российской Федерации, а также провинций Китая.
📸🇨🇳Владимир Путин осмотрел экспозицию VIII Российско-Китайского ЭКСПО
Выставка проходит в Харбине с 17 по 21 мая.Традиционно включает в себя масштабную выставочную зону, где представлены стенды российских и китайских компаний, экспозиции субъектов Российской Федерации, а также провинций Китая.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from es
