Завтра в фонде «Культурный транзит» пройдет ярмарка современного искусства Happy new ART
В ярмарке современного искусства участвуют художники: Wyrdwhisper, Vladimir R, blcb8a, Joe.snailart, RussuDa, Disamnia, untidy.worlddd6996, Олеся Фрич, Наталья Подунова, Егор Подрезов, Тамара Джохадзе, МАШАГРИБ, Виктор Сапронов и другие.
Завтра в фонде «Культурный транзит» пройдет ярмарка современного искусства Happy new ART
В ярмарке современного искусства участвуют художники: Wyrdwhisper, Vladimir R, blcb8a, Joe.snailart, RussuDa, Disamnia, untidy.worlddd6996, Олеся Фрич, Наталья Подунова, Егор Подрезов, Тамара Джохадзе, МАШАГРИБ, Виктор Сапронов и другие.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from es
