11 января прошёл вечер писем политзаключённым в казанском штабе! Спасибо коллегам и новеньким за поддержку!! Мы будем собираться и продолжать дело наших храбрых соратников, кто остаются в тюрьмах и эмиграции. Всё обязательно будет хорошо, продолжайте находить политзаключённых со всей России и писать им самостоятельно ✉️
11 января прошёл вечер писем политзаключённым в казанском штабе! Спасибо коллегам и новеньким за поддержку!! Мы будем собираться и продолжать дело наших храбрых соратников, кто остаются в тюрьмах и эмиграции. Всё обязательно будет хорошо, продолжайте находить политзаключённых со всей России и писать им самостоятельно ✉️
Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from es
