Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 4072 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 8168 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Грокс | Telegram Webview: groks/3977 -
«После рекордного с 1999 года убытка Газпром сумел заработать даже больше, чем ожидал – почти 46 млрд долларов. Причем европейцы внесли значительный вклад в рост доходов компании, так как закупали российский газ по максимуму, насколько позволяли газопроводы» — пишет Взгляд, ссылаясь на зампредседателя правления корпорации. Но теперь белки истерички хоронят «национальное достояние» из-за прекращения транзита через Украину. Что с них взять, кроме анализов?
«После рекордного с 1999 года убытка Газпром сумел заработать даже больше, чем ожидал – почти 46 млрд долларов. Причем европейцы внесли значительный вклад в рост доходов компании, так как закупали российский газ по максимуму, насколько позволяли газопроводы» — пишет Взгляд, ссылаясь на зампредседателя правления корпорации. Но теперь белки истерички хоронят «национальное достояние» из-за прекращения транзита через Украину. Что с них взять, кроме анализов?
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from es
