Прокурор запросил для кировской активистки 2 года колонии-поселения за оскорбление Владлена Татарского
Обвинение также попросило запретить Светлане Мариной администрировать сайты в течение трех лет, сообщил «7х7» активист из Кирова. 56-летнюю активистку судят за повторную дискредитацию армии. Дело возбудили из-за ролика, в котором она назвала погибшего военкора Татарского «преступником».
Светлана с 2014 года участвует в акциях протеста. Она выступала против пенсионной реформы, строительства завода с особо опасными отходами и нарушений прав человека. В 2022 году ее судили за сине-желтые ленты на одежде, но позже оправдали.
Прокурор запросил для кировской активистки 2 года колонии-поселения за оскорбление Владлена Татарского
Обвинение также попросило запретить Светлане Мариной администрировать сайты в течение трех лет, сообщил «7х7» активист из Кирова. 56-летнюю активистку судят за повторную дискредитацию армии. Дело возбудили из-за ролика, в котором она назвала погибшего военкора Татарского «преступником».
Светлана с 2014 года участвует в акциях протеста. Она выступала против пенсионной реформы, строительства завода с особо опасными отходами и нарушений прав человека. В 2022 году ее судили за сине-желтые ленты на одежде, но позже оправдали.
In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare.
from es
