Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 1429 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 9621 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Inekas | انعکاس | Telegram Webview: inekas/193 -
🔸این مطالعه نگاهی به میثاق مدینه (همچنین به سند صحیفه نیز معروف است) دارد که (به گفته اکثر محققان) سندی معتبر است که از زمان محمد پیامبر نشأت می‌گیرد، هرچند تاریخ انتقال آن تا حدودی مبهم است. اگرچه اعتبار آن تقریباً به طور کلی توسط محققان مدرن پذیرفته شده است، اما بحث‌هایی در مورد تاریخ، زمینه و اهداف متن وجود داشته است.
🔸لینستت در ارائه خود، تفاسیر مختلف را مورد بحث قرار خواهد داد و تفسیرهای خود را ارائه خواهد کرد؛ همچنین نشان می‌دهد هدف متن، دسته‌بندی مجدد مومنان با پیشینه‌های مختلف در زیر چتر یک هویت جدید و مشترک درون‌گروهی بوده است.
————————————————— 🔹 ارائه مبتنی بر این مقاله خواهد بود. Lindstedt, Ilkka. "“One Community to the Exclusion of Other People”: A Superordinate Identity in the Medinan Community". The Study of Islamic Origins: New Perspectives and Contexts, edited by Mette Bjerregaard Mortensen, Guillaume Dye, Isaac W. Oliver and Tommaso Tesei, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 325-376.
🔸این مطالعه نگاهی به میثاق مدینه (همچنین به سند صحیفه نیز معروف است) دارد که (به گفته اکثر محققان) سندی معتبر است که از زمان محمد پیامبر نشأت می‌گیرد، هرچند تاریخ انتقال آن تا حدودی مبهم است. اگرچه اعتبار آن تقریباً به طور کلی توسط محققان مدرن پذیرفته شده است، اما بحث‌هایی در مورد تاریخ، زمینه و اهداف متن وجود داشته است.
🔸لینستت در ارائه خود، تفاسیر مختلف را مورد بحث قرار خواهد داد و تفسیرهای خود را ارائه خواهد کرد؛ همچنین نشان می‌دهد هدف متن، دسته‌بندی مجدد مومنان با پیشینه‌های مختلف در زیر چتر یک هویت جدید و مشترک درون‌گروهی بوده است.
————————————————— 🔹 ارائه مبتنی بر این مقاله خواهد بود. Lindstedt, Ilkka. "“One Community to the Exclusion of Other People”: A Superordinate Identity in the Medinan Community". The Study of Islamic Origins: New Perspectives and Contexts, edited by Mette Bjerregaard Mortensen, Guillaume Dye, Isaac W. Oliver and Tommaso Tesei, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 325-376.
"Markets were cheering this economic recovery and return to strong economic growth, but the cheers will turn to tears if the inflation outbreak pushes businesses and consumers to the brink of recession," he added. Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from es
