Военкор и ведущий аналитической итоговой программы на ТВ-3 Александр Малькевич на прямой линии с Президентом РФ. Журналист спросил о работе Фонда «Защитники отечества», созданном для помощи ветеранам СВО и семьям погибших. О чём ещё спрашивали Президента, Александр расскажет уже в это воскресенье в 23.00 в итоговой аналитической программе на ТВ-3. А также проанализирует, кому было выгодно убийство генерал-лейтенанта Игоря Кириллова, и что за загадочные НЛО пугают американцев.
Военкор и ведущий аналитической итоговой программы на ТВ-3 Александр Малькевич на прямой линии с Президентом РФ. Журналист спросил о работе Фонда «Защитники отечества», созданном для помощи ветеранам СВО и семьям погибших. О чём ещё спрашивали Президента, Александр расскажет уже в это воскресенье в 23.00 в итоговой аналитической программе на ТВ-3. А также проанализирует, кому было выгодно убийство генерал-лейтенанта Игоря Кириллова, и что за загадочные НЛО пугают американцев.
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from es
