Ладно, у меня просто ПМС и мне страшно, что я не справлюсь. На самом деле мне есть на кого опереться. Куча прекрасных женщин с их котами, принц, коллеги и умные дядечки, которым я с регулярной периодичностью плачусь в плечо.
но с обесцениванием себя и подстраиванием под чужие ценности пора завязывать.
(и если все-таки одна затея про шутов выгорит, я буду бесконечно счастлива)
Ладно, у меня просто ПМС и мне страшно, что я не справлюсь. На самом деле мне есть на кого опереться. Куча прекрасных женщин с их котами, принц, коллеги и умные дядечки, которым я с регулярной периодичностью плачусь в плечо.
но с обесцениванием себя и подстраиванием под чужие ценности пора завязывать.
(и если все-таки одна затея про шутов выгорит, я буду бесконечно счастлива)
BY Ренессансом единым
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from es
