✅положи в обувь теплые стельки; ✅носки лучше шерстяные, чем хлопковые; ✅в варежках теплее, чем в перчатках; ✅чаще заходи в общественные места, чтобы согреваться.
⚠️Крем нельзя наносить на лицо и руки перед выходом, делай это за полчаса.
⚠️Покалывание кожи - первый признак нарушения кровотока, дальше - обморожение.
✅положи в обувь теплые стельки; ✅носки лучше шерстяные, чем хлопковые; ✅в варежках теплее, чем в перчатках; ✅чаще заходи в общественные места, чтобы согреваться.
⚠️Крем нельзя наносить на лицо и руки перед выходом, делай это за полчаса.
⚠️Покалывание кожи - первый признак нарушения кровотока, дальше - обморожение.
Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from es