Все мотолыги попадают в рай. Скольким пацанам эти древние крутые крокодилы спасли жизнь, включая меня
Была одна, у нее то ли прогорел, то ли что-то еще выпускной коллектор и выхлоп шел в десант. Едешь на броне, ноги через люк в десанте. На улице -20, а ногам тепло ^^
Все мотолыги попадают в рай. Скольким пацанам эти древние крутые крокодилы спасли жизнь, включая меня
Была одна, у нее то ли прогорел, то ли что-то еще выпускной коллектор и выхлоп шел в десант. Едешь на броне, ноги через люк в десанте. На улице -20, а ногам тепло ^^
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app.
from es
