یک اثر جنایی-ترسناک درجه یک. هم توصیفات هم اتفاقات و هم مضامین مختلف داستان بی‌رحمانه بودن. الان بعد خوندنش جرئت نمی‌کنم تو این تاریکی برم آشپزخونه آب بخورم. کوتاه و خوش‌خوان هم بود. عصر شروع کردم و تا وسطش رفتم الان هم تمومش کردم. فکر کنم نسخهٔ فیزیکی‌ش ۱۰۰ صفحه باشه. من تو طاقچه خوندم که ۱۴۶ صفحه بود.
یک اثر جنایی-ترسناک درجه یک. هم توصیفات هم اتفاقات و هم مضامین مختلف داستان بی‌رحمانه بودن. الان بعد خوندنش جرئت نمی‌کنم تو این تاریکی برم آشپزخونه آب بخورم. کوتاه و خوش‌خوان هم بود. عصر شروع کردم و تا وسطش رفتم الان هم تمومش کردم. فکر کنم نسخهٔ فیزیکی‌ش ۱۰۰ صفحه باشه. من تو طاقچه خوندم که ۱۴۶ صفحه بود.
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from es
