❗️И вот именно этих тварей хочет видеть Подоляка, Зергулио, военкурятник и беглые хохлы в качестве наших сограждан. И давят на нашего Президента о снятии ограничений в Шереметьево. А по мне, так весь хутор сожгут и плевать. И ограничения усилить. Как хохлам, так и всем "ценным специалистам".
На вопрос:" Нахрена это постить?!" Отвечаю: "Чтобы помнили и не обольщались, что "нас там ждут и там наши люди! " И странно, когда это непонятно, да?
❗️И вот именно этих тварей хочет видеть Подоляка, Зергулио, военкурятник и беглые хохлы в качестве наших сограждан. И давят на нашего Президента о снятии ограничений в Шереметьево. А по мне, так весь хутор сожгут и плевать. И ограничения усилить. Как хохлам, так и всем "ценным специалистам".
На вопрос:" Нахрена это постить?!" Отвечаю: "Чтобы помнили и не обольщались, что "нас там ждут и там наши люди! " И странно, когда это непонятно, да?
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from es
