Еще одной важной для нас поэтической книгой, изданной в 2024 году, является "Здесь обернешься" Александры Хольновой, нашего постоянного автора. На перезентации книги выступили Владимир Гандельсман, Степан Самарин ("журнал на коленке"), Александр Бредихин и Вячеслав Глазырин ("несовременник").
Еще одной важной для нас поэтической книгой, изданной в 2024 году, является "Здесь обернешься" Александры Хольновой, нашего постоянного автора. На перезентации книги выступили Владимир Гандельсман, Степан Самарин ("журнал на коленке"), Александр Бредихин и Вячеслав Глазырин ("несовременник").
BY несовременник
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client.
from es
