Дорогие подписчики. Вы видели упреждение телеги о том, что "если аккаунт не будет активен в течение ... дней, то канал останется без владельца". И так как один изумительный мобильный оператор досрочно расторг договор и перепродал номер, на который зарегистрирован аккаунт-владелец канала, то было решено создать второй канал (Зазеркалье 2.0). Поэтому переходите туда, уж его аккаунт точно зарегистрирован на нормальный номер. 😁 А раньше заняться этим не могли, ибо всей редакцией всё-таки на службе, времени особо не было.
Зазеркалье - нежное, безумное, переходящее на версию 2.0
Дорогие подписчики. Вы видели упреждение телеги о том, что "если аккаунт не будет активен в течение ... дней, то канал останется без владельца". И так как один изумительный мобильный оператор досрочно расторг договор и перепродал номер, на который зарегистрирован аккаунт-владелец канала, то было решено создать второй канал (Зазеркалье 2.0). Поэтому переходите туда, уж его аккаунт точно зарегистрирован на нормальный номер. 😁 А раньше заняться этим не могли, ибо всей редакцией всё-таки на службе, времени особо не было.
Зазеркалье - нежное, безумное, переходящее на версию 2.0
And indeed, volatility has been a hallmark of the market environment so far in 2022, with the S&P 500 still down more than 10% for the year-to-date after first sliding into a correction last month. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, has held at a lofty level of more than 30. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from es
