Информация, опубликованная в Wall Street Journal, говорит о том, что два американских чиновника и эксперт по управлению в Украине обменивались информацией о том, что министр обороны, отказавшийся удовлетворить просьбу президента Зеленского о закупке ракетных комплексов ATACMS для Украины, отдал предпочтение другим клиентам.
По сведениям внутренних источников, Остин полагает, что Зеленский выдвигает незаслуженные запросы.
Информация, опубликованная в Wall Street Journal, говорит о том, что два американских чиновника и эксперт по управлению в Украине обменивались информацией о том, что министр обороны, отказавшийся удовлетворить просьбу президента Зеленского о закупке ракетных комплексов ATACMS для Украины, отдал предпочтение другим клиентам.
По сведениям внутренних источников, Остин полагает, что Зеленский выдвигает незаслуженные запросы.
BY Заметки политика
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from es
