Вот на днях получили новые ароматы, я гуляла по тц, нанюхалась всего впредь на пару месяцев. Ну, вроде бы, успокойся ты уже, носи что есть, ан нет. Мой мозг судорожно подбирает, что я буду заказывать после новогодних. Список составляю уже ✍️😐
Кто такой же?
Фото спросторов интернета Моя фотка в комментах 😅👇
Вот на днях получили новые ароматы, я гуляла по тц, нанюхалась всего впредь на пару месяцев. Ну, вроде бы, успокойся ты уже, носи что есть, ан нет. Мой мозг судорожно подбирает, что я буду заказывать после новогодних. Список составляю уже ✍️😐
Кто такой же?
Фото спросторов интернета Моя фотка в комментах 😅👇
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from es
