Дорогие защитники Отечества, примите наши искренние поздравления и слова благодарности за ваше мужество и преданность. Мы с вами, вы в нашем сердце, и мы вместе сделаем все, чтобы поддержать вас в этот сложный период. С праздником вас, дорогие друзья! Слава защитникам Отечества!
Дорогие защитники Отечества, примите наши искренние поздравления и слова благодарности за ваше мужество и преданность. Мы с вами, вы в нашем сердце, и мы вместе сделаем все, чтобы поддержать вас в этот сложный период. С праздником вас, дорогие друзья! Слава защитникам Отечества!
#80ДобрыхДелСКГА
BY Kochkarov_RM
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from es
