Москвичку,обозвавшую строителей «руснёй» и угрожавшую им пистолетом, оштрафовали на 2 тыс. рублей.
Яну Джоган признали виновной по административной статье о пропаганде и публичной демонстрации нацистской и другой экстремистской символики, сообщил корр RT из зала суда. Её адвокат на заседание не пришёл.
На Джоган также заведено уголовное дело по статье о хулиганстве с применением оружия, решения по нему пока нет.
Напомним, в ноябре женщина кричала на рабочих, материлась, угрожала им пневматическим пистолетом, заявляя, что она «нерусская» и «русню е****ю терпеть не будет».
Джоган с 2022 года в соцсетях позиционирует себя украинкой и ведёт их на украинском языке.
Москвичку,обозвавшую строителей «руснёй» и угрожавшую им пистолетом, оштрафовали на 2 тыс. рублей.
Яну Джоган признали виновной по административной статье о пропаганде и публичной демонстрации нацистской и другой экстремистской символики, сообщил корр RT из зала суда. Её адвокат на заседание не пришёл.
На Джоган также заведено уголовное дело по статье о хулиганстве с применением оружия, решения по нему пока нет.
Напомним, в ноябре женщина кричала на рабочих, материлась, угрожала им пневматическим пистолетом, заявляя, что она «нерусская» и «русню е****ю терпеть не будет».
Джоган с 2022 года в соцсетях позиционирует себя украинкой и ведёт их на украинском языке.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from es
