Чекисты в Дагестане задержали администраторов анонимных телеграм-каналов. Задержанные распространяли ложную информацию о мобилизации в Дагестане и в республиках Северного Кавказа, провоцировали проведение несогласованных акций протеста. В настоящее время проводятся оперативные мероприятия по задержанию других участников преступных групп.
Чекисты в Дагестане задержали администраторов анонимных телеграм-каналов. Задержанные распространяли ложную информацию о мобилизации в Дагестане и в республиках Северного Кавказа, провоцировали проведение несогласованных акций протеста. В настоящее время проводятся оперативные мероприятия по задержанию других участников преступных групп.
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from es
