Арал стал богаче водой и рыбой - впервые за пять лет выполнен план подачи влаги
Обычно направляли 400 млн кубов воды, а в этом году уже подали почти млрд кубометров и полмиллиарда планируют подать до конца года. На сегодня объем воды в Северном Арале составляет 22 млрд кубометров. Благодаря этому рыбаки смогут выловить 8000 тонн рыбы в год, а не 400 тонн, как прежде.
Арал стал богаче водой и рыбой - впервые за пять лет выполнен план подачи влаги
Обычно направляли 400 млн кубов воды, а в этом году уже подали почти млрд кубометров и полмиллиарда планируют подать до конца года. На сегодня объем воды в Северном Арале составляет 22 млрд кубометров. Благодаря этому рыбаки смогут выловить 8000 тонн рыбы в год, а не 400 тонн, как прежде.
BY СОСЕДИ | Центральная Азия
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram? Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from es
