Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 522 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8714 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Ulnovosti.ru | Telegram Webview: ulnovosti_rezerv/504 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Ленинский районный суд отказал в полном обьеме в удовлетворении иска о защите чести, достоинства и деловой репутации Елене Ивлеевой (Долговой). Напомним, руководитель Аппарата ЗСО требовала возместить ей ущерб в 4,5 миллионов с Алексея Куринного, Айрата Гибатдинова, Рамиля Хакимова и Алексея Лашманова, распространивших ее переписку с владельцем пивзавода "Трехсосенский" Михаилом Родионовым.

Тем не менее, в региональном СУ СКе признали Ивлееву потерпевшей и возбудили уголовное дело по ст 137 и 138 УК РФ (нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни, а именно за незаконное собирание или распространение сведений о частной жизни лица, составляющих его личную или семейную тайну, без его согласия либо распространение этих сведений в публичном выступлении, публично демонстрирующемся произведении или средствах массовой информации)



group-telegram.com/ulnovosti_rezerv/504
Create:
Last Update:

Ленинский районный суд отказал в полном обьеме в удовлетворении иска о защите чести, достоинства и деловой репутации Елене Ивлеевой (Долговой). Напомним, руководитель Аппарата ЗСО требовала возместить ей ущерб в 4,5 миллионов с Алексея Куринного, Айрата Гибатдинова, Рамиля Хакимова и Алексея Лашманова, распространивших ее переписку с владельцем пивзавода "Трехсосенский" Михаилом Родионовым.

Тем не менее, в региональном СУ СКе признали Ивлееву потерпевшей и возбудили уголовное дело по ст 137 и 138 УК РФ (нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни, а именно за незаконное собирание или распространение сведений о частной жизни лица, составляющих его личную или семейную тайну, без его согласия либо распространение этих сведений в публичном выступлении, публично демонстрирующемся произведении или средствах массовой информации)

BY Ulnovosti.ru




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/ulnovosti_rezerv/504

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country.
from es


Telegram Ulnovosti.ru
FROM American