Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 392 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8584 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 UX Live 🔥 | Telegram Webview: uxlive/15734 -
Платный доступ в UX Live Classic Вы получите: 1. КОНТЕНТ НА СЕГОДНЯ (без редактирования) 2. Приколы (не смешные) 3. Пьяные посты в 4 утра 4. Срачи на разные темы 5. Видео-кружочки
Я получу: 1. Денежку
Кстати возврата нет, так что сумма за первый месяц всё равно спишется (это из-за бота, они не могут в возвраты)
Платный доступ в UX Live Classic Вы получите: 1. КОНТЕНТ НА СЕГОДНЯ (без редактирования) 2. Приколы (не смешные) 3. Пьяные посты в 4 утра 4. Срачи на разные темы 5. Видео-кружочки
Я получу: 1. Денежку
Кстати возврата нет, так что сумма за первый месяц всё равно спишется (это из-за бота, они не могут в возвраты)
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from es
