В пятницу силовики опубликовали видео с брестчанином. Вменяют участие в протестах 3.5 года назад
Мужчина представляется Глебом Валерьевичем. Фамилия в опубликованном ролике обрезана.
Силовики показали кадры с акции протеста, где люди стоят в "сцепке". Брестская "Весна" идентифицировала эти кадры как протест, проходивший 10 августа 2020 на пешеходной улице Советской в Бресте.
Что с мужчиной сейчас, в каком он статусе — неизвестно.
В пятницу силовики опубликовали видео с брестчанином. Вменяют участие в протестах 3.5 года назад
Мужчина представляется Глебом Валерьевичем. Фамилия в опубликованном ролике обрезана.
Силовики показали кадры с акции протеста, где люди стоят в "сцепке". Брестская "Весна" идентифицировала эти кадры как протест, проходивший 10 августа 2020 на пешеходной улице Советской в Бресте.
Что с мужчиной сейчас, в каком он статусе — неизвестно.
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from es
