У депутата закса из старых алкоголиков день рождения. Давно пытающаяся переспать с ним другая депутат сообщает ему что у нее есть для него подарок. Приглашает к себе в кабинет раздевается догола и у нее остается один лишь бантик на самом пикантном месте! Именинник закатывая рукав по локоть: "Ну и далеко он там?"
У депутата закса из старых алкоголиков день рождения. Давно пытающаяся переспать с ним другая депутат сообщает ему что у нее есть для него подарок. Приглашает к себе в кабинет раздевается догола и у нее остается один лишь бантик на самом пикантном месте! Именинник закатывая рукав по локоть: "Ну и далеко он там?"
BY ВВП: во власти Петербурга
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from es
