Вы даже не представляете, как сильно меня обидели эти письма.
Я всегда и везде говорила, что мне нравится руграм. Потому что и с редакторами повезло и остальное. А получаю пассивно-агрессивные письма, делающие меня главной злодейкой.
Вы даже не представляете, как сильно меня обидели эти письма.
Я всегда и везде говорила, что мне нравится руграм. Потому что и с редакторами повезло и остальное. А получаю пассивно-агрессивные письма, делающие меня главной злодейкой.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from es
