What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
~BC/T
BY Out of the Dark®️ 🌔 🇺🇸 🌕
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from es
