Сурков гордится тем, что не читал «Государя» и «Капитал».
Смотрю на результаты работы Суркова по Украине, Абхазии и Южной Осетии (по последним двум у нас еще будет много неприятных сюрпризов, которые государству придется нивелировать) и понимаю, что только такой «политический менеджер» как Сурков мог написать такую никчемную и жалкую беллетристику как «Околоноля»
Сурков гордится тем, что не читал «Государя» и «Капитал».
Смотрю на результаты работы Суркова по Украине, Абхазии и Южной Осетии (по последним двум у нас еще будет много неприятных сюрпризов, которые государству придется нивелировать) и понимаю, что только такой «политический менеджер» как Сурков мог написать такую никчемную и жалкую беллетристику как «Околоноля»
BY Фетисов. Мнение
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from us
