На Реюньоне избрание первого депутата от национального собрания подтверждается.
Также депутат от национального собрания избрался во втором округе #Майотт, где местное население просто больше не может от наплыва мигрантов из остальных Коморских островов и Африки, санитарного кризиса и антисанитарии.
Её оппонент, депутат созыва 2022-24 Ансур Камардин, признал своё поражение.
На Реюньоне избрание первого депутата от национального собрания подтверждается.
Также депутат от национального собрания избрался во втором округе #Майотт, где местное население просто больше не может от наплыва мигрантов из остальных Коморских островов и Африки, санитарного кризиса и антисанитарии.
Её оппонент, депутат созыва 2022-24 Ансур Камардин, признал своё поражение.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from us
