🚨LIVE NOW🚨
Get in here:
https://rumble.com/v6u7fgd-eex-live-june-2-2024-devon-stack-blackpilled.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp
Get in here:
https://rumble.com/v6u7fgd-eex-live-june-2-2024-devon-stack-blackpilled.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp
Rumble
EEx Live | June 2, 2024 | Devon Stack - BlackPilled
Check out Devon Stack at the link below https://x.com/Black_Pilled https://rumble.com/user/blackpilled We livestream Sunday, Monday, Wednesday and Friday in the evening around 5:30 pm est or so depend
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It would be a shame if this turned into something akin to the “Bill Clinton is a rapist!” thing mixed with he will not divide us. Complete shame if for the rest of his life people shouted “fuck the jews” everywhere he went as everyone around him laughed at him.
The reason white people are increasingly recognizing that “colorblindness” seems to be a one-way street, lacking any equivalent to “white guilt” in other groups, is easy to understand through the lens of group selection.
Group selection theory suggests that certain groups evolve not only at the individual level but also at the collective level. This means traits can persist even if they are costly or dangerous to the individual, as long as they benefit the group as a whole. An example of this would be the loud alarm call of ground squirrels, which alerts the group to a predator’s presence but endangers the individual sounding the warning. Such behaviors persist, particularly in cooperative groups, because they promote collective survival.
When applied to white European-descended peoples, whose historical survival has relied heavily on group cooperation, this framework explains much of today’s social dynamics and the danger facing white people. Group selection can be an effective, some might argue superior, method for passing on a group’s genes. However, its success is dependent on one of two critical conditions remaining relatively stable, or the strategy rapidly falls apart.
First, it requires a high degree of in-group preference, meaning altruistic behaviors are directed primarily toward members of the same group. Without this, group-selected individuals risk serving foreign groups at the expense of their own, undermining their collective strength.
Second, it assumes minimal migration between groups, particularly between those employing group-selection strategies and those prioritizing individual survival. When significant migration occurs, the group-selection strategy begins to collapse at the genetic level. Self-sacrificing behaviors, once beneficial, become detrimental as resources are diverted from the group to outsiders now present due to migration. This explains the behavior of individual white people who appear driven to serve members of incoming foreign groups they perceive as “disadvantaged” in some way. Under normal conditions with low levels of migration inline with what would have been experienced historically, these people would have been serving the disadvantaged in their own group, enhancing the strength and survival of white people.
This dynamic also operates in reverse. These same altruistic individuals from the group-selected population may migrate to other regions, redirecting their sacrifices toward foreign groups in their new environment. Consider Christian missionaries who, rather than aiding the impoverished within their own communities, prioritize the poor in distant lands like Africa or Haiti.
In essence, mass migration poses a death sentence to group-selected peoples unless they maintain a robust level of in-group preference to counteract these challenges. Without such resilience, their altruistic tendencies become a liability, eroding the very foundation of their group’s survival.
In other words, mass migration, combined with the deliberate suppression of white collective identity, is at best a tragic combination of conditions brewing a toxic cocktail destined to erase white populations. More likely, it is a meticulously researched and intentionally wielded strategic weapon, purposefully deployed to orchestrate the inevitable outcome of white genocide.
Group selection theory suggests that certain groups evolve not only at the individual level but also at the collective level. This means traits can persist even if they are costly or dangerous to the individual, as long as they benefit the group as a whole. An example of this would be the loud alarm call of ground squirrels, which alerts the group to a predator’s presence but endangers the individual sounding the warning. Such behaviors persist, particularly in cooperative groups, because they promote collective survival.
When applied to white European-descended peoples, whose historical survival has relied heavily on group cooperation, this framework explains much of today’s social dynamics and the danger facing white people. Group selection can be an effective, some might argue superior, method for passing on a group’s genes. However, its success is dependent on one of two critical conditions remaining relatively stable, or the strategy rapidly falls apart.
First, it requires a high degree of in-group preference, meaning altruistic behaviors are directed primarily toward members of the same group. Without this, group-selected individuals risk serving foreign groups at the expense of their own, undermining their collective strength.
Second, it assumes minimal migration between groups, particularly between those employing group-selection strategies and those prioritizing individual survival. When significant migration occurs, the group-selection strategy begins to collapse at the genetic level. Self-sacrificing behaviors, once beneficial, become detrimental as resources are diverted from the group to outsiders now present due to migration. This explains the behavior of individual white people who appear driven to serve members of incoming foreign groups they perceive as “disadvantaged” in some way. Under normal conditions with low levels of migration inline with what would have been experienced historically, these people would have been serving the disadvantaged in their own group, enhancing the strength and survival of white people.
This dynamic also operates in reverse. These same altruistic individuals from the group-selected population may migrate to other regions, redirecting their sacrifices toward foreign groups in their new environment. Consider Christian missionaries who, rather than aiding the impoverished within their own communities, prioritize the poor in distant lands like Africa or Haiti.
In essence, mass migration poses a death sentence to group-selected peoples unless they maintain a robust level of in-group preference to counteract these challenges. Without such resilience, their altruistic tendencies become a liability, eroding the very foundation of their group’s survival.
In other words, mass migration, combined with the deliberate suppression of white collective identity, is at best a tragic combination of conditions brewing a toxic cocktail destined to erase white populations. More likely, it is a meticulously researched and intentionally wielded strategic weapon, purposefully deployed to orchestrate the inevitable outcome of white genocide.
There seems to be a lot of people that think the only evidence that points to Trump's involvement with the Epstein affair is a tweet from Elon so I decided to lay out a few things that many are not aware of:
Trump and Epstein were well documented friends for nearly two decades, from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, hanging out in elite social circles in New York and Palm Beach. Their association is obvious in numerous photographs, including at Mar-a-Lago events, and in entries obtained in Epstein’s “black book,” which listed 16 phone numbers for Trump. Trump himself described Epstein in a 2002 New York Magazine interview as a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with,” noting, “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” This means that Trump, at minimum, was aware of Epstein’s behavior and did not distance himself from Epstein until his legal troubles became public.
Epstein told Michael Wolff in an interview that he was “Donald’s closest friend for ten years,” a claim backed up by their frequent well documented interactions, from hanging out at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion to partying at Mar-a-Lago. A video 1992 shows Trump and Epstein laughing together, pointing out women on the dance floor at a party at Mar-a-Lago with Ghislaine Maxwell in attendance.
Defenders of Trump argue that he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, citing a supposed incident where Epstein was removed for inappropriate behavior, they claim this is proof that Trump, after several years of associating with Epstein, finally figured out what Epstein was up to. This narrative stems from a 2019 statement by Trump’s team after the Epstein affair became national news. That is the only evidence that this ever even happened. The claim lacks corroboration from any other source, and no police reports or any other accounts confirm it ever happened. What is documented, however, is a dispute they had over a land deal. The two competed to purchase the Maison de l’Amitié, a Palm Beach mansion owned by Abe Gosman that went into bankruptcy. Epstein initially bid $37.25 million, but Trump outbid him, securing the property for $41.35 million. Reports, including those from the Palm Beach Post, detail that it was Epstein, not Trump, who was furious, believing Trump used insider connections to win the deal. This dispute aligns with the timeline of their apparent rift, as their social interactions dwindled after 2004.
Multiple women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct tied to Epstein’s activities, going back to the 1990s. One accuser, identified as “Jane” at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, testified that Epstein introduced her to Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14. Another woman, Stacey Williams, alleged that in the 1990s, Epstein brought her to Trump Tower, where Trump groped her while Epstein watched, describing it as a “twisted game.” Williams received a postcard from Trump afterward, which was published in The Guardian.
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s brother, stated in a 2009 deposition that Trump flew on Epstein’s plane “numerous times,” Trump has acknowledged using Epstein’s plane at least once, claiming it was a non-commercial flight from Florida to New York. Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot, Larry Visoski, testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 sex-trafficking trial that he remembered Donald Trump as a frequent passenger on Epstein’s private plane, known as the “Lolita Express.”
Alan Dershowitz, who defended Epstein in the 2008 plea deal, also represents Trump. Dershowitz himself faced allegations from Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who claimed she was forced to have sex with him, despite this Trump hired him anyway. Ken Starr, another Epstein lawyer involved in the 2008 deal, also joined Trump’s impeachment defense team.
Trump and Epstein were well documented friends for nearly two decades, from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, hanging out in elite social circles in New York and Palm Beach. Their association is obvious in numerous photographs, including at Mar-a-Lago events, and in entries obtained in Epstein’s “black book,” which listed 16 phone numbers for Trump. Trump himself described Epstein in a 2002 New York Magazine interview as a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with,” noting, “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” This means that Trump, at minimum, was aware of Epstein’s behavior and did not distance himself from Epstein until his legal troubles became public.
Epstein told Michael Wolff in an interview that he was “Donald’s closest friend for ten years,” a claim backed up by their frequent well documented interactions, from hanging out at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion to partying at Mar-a-Lago. A video 1992 shows Trump and Epstein laughing together, pointing out women on the dance floor at a party at Mar-a-Lago with Ghislaine Maxwell in attendance.
Defenders of Trump argue that he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, citing a supposed incident where Epstein was removed for inappropriate behavior, they claim this is proof that Trump, after several years of associating with Epstein, finally figured out what Epstein was up to. This narrative stems from a 2019 statement by Trump’s team after the Epstein affair became national news. That is the only evidence that this ever even happened. The claim lacks corroboration from any other source, and no police reports or any other accounts confirm it ever happened. What is documented, however, is a dispute they had over a land deal. The two competed to purchase the Maison de l’Amitié, a Palm Beach mansion owned by Abe Gosman that went into bankruptcy. Epstein initially bid $37.25 million, but Trump outbid him, securing the property for $41.35 million. Reports, including those from the Palm Beach Post, detail that it was Epstein, not Trump, who was furious, believing Trump used insider connections to win the deal. This dispute aligns with the timeline of their apparent rift, as their social interactions dwindled after 2004.
Multiple women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct tied to Epstein’s activities, going back to the 1990s. One accuser, identified as “Jane” at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, testified that Epstein introduced her to Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14. Another woman, Stacey Williams, alleged that in the 1990s, Epstein brought her to Trump Tower, where Trump groped her while Epstein watched, describing it as a “twisted game.” Williams received a postcard from Trump afterward, which was published in The Guardian.
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s brother, stated in a 2009 deposition that Trump flew on Epstein’s plane “numerous times,” Trump has acknowledged using Epstein’s plane at least once, claiming it was a non-commercial flight from Florida to New York. Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot, Larry Visoski, testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 sex-trafficking trial that he remembered Donald Trump as a frequent passenger on Epstein’s private plane, known as the “Lolita Express.”
Alan Dershowitz, who defended Epstein in the 2008 plea deal, also represents Trump. Dershowitz himself faced allegations from Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who claimed she was forced to have sex with him, despite this Trump hired him anyway. Ken Starr, another Epstein lawyer involved in the 2008 deal, also joined Trump’s impeachment defense team.
Trump inexplicably appointed the completely unqualified Alex Acosta as Secretary of Labor in 2017. He had no background in labor, but he was U.S. Attorney in Miami and oversaw Epstein’s 2008 sweetheart plea deal, which allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two state prostitution charges, serve only 13 months with work-release privileges, and avoid federal sex-trafficking charges. The Miami Herald called the deal “one of the most lenient sentences for a serial sex offender in U.S. history,” and was ruled illegal in 2019 for violating victims’ rights.
Trump appointed William Barr as Attorney General in 2019, shortly before Epstein’s death in federal custody. Barr’s father, Donald Barr, hired Epstein as a teacher at Dalton School in the 1970s, despite Epstein’s lack of qualifications, the first step in Epstein’s rise from a nobody to elite circles. Epstein then dies by "suicide" in August 2019 while in federal custody in a facility overseen by Trump’s Justice Department. Barr publicly defended the suicide ruling, as did Trump in an interview with Tucker Carlson, and now joined by the Trump appointed heads of the FBI Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.
Trump’s former mentor, Roy Cohn, is considered the proto Epstein. He was known for his ties to organized Jewish crime and blackmail schemes, was accused of using compromising information to influence powerful figures, just like Epstein. It's no wonder that Trump would be comfortable hanging out with his replacement.
"But the Democrats would have released the files!"
Epstein’s network implicated figures on both sides of the isle, including Democrats like Bill Clinton, not to mention powerful doners to both parties. Then of course there are the obvious ties to Israel that both parties seem perfectly happy to cover up even if it involves presidential assassinations, attacks on US Naval vessels, or mass casualty terror attacks.
The Epstein files released under Trump’s administration "Phase 1" were heavily redacted, with no new revelations. Trump's appointees claim they are having trouble even tracking down the files. Even if democrats wanted to go on an absurd suicide mission and torpedo the whole thing, implicating themselves and Israel, there's not even a clear indication of who would have had access to what.
The ruling class, even under Democratic administrations, prioritize institutional stability over releasing files that could implicate numerous elites, destabilizing public trust in the system. Continuity of power reigns supreme and always takes priority. If you don't understand this and look at politics like a football game, you're not going to make it.
This is not exhaustive and doesn't even include the endless ties (including familiar) Trump has to Jewish organized crime and the Israeli government. I've done a whole stream on that called "Trump and the Jews" you can find on Rumble, Odysee, and Bitchute.
Trump appointed William Barr as Attorney General in 2019, shortly before Epstein’s death in federal custody. Barr’s father, Donald Barr, hired Epstein as a teacher at Dalton School in the 1970s, despite Epstein’s lack of qualifications, the first step in Epstein’s rise from a nobody to elite circles. Epstein then dies by "suicide" in August 2019 while in federal custody in a facility overseen by Trump’s Justice Department. Barr publicly defended the suicide ruling, as did Trump in an interview with Tucker Carlson, and now joined by the Trump appointed heads of the FBI Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.
Trump’s former mentor, Roy Cohn, is considered the proto Epstein. He was known for his ties to organized Jewish crime and blackmail schemes, was accused of using compromising information to influence powerful figures, just like Epstein. It's no wonder that Trump would be comfortable hanging out with his replacement.
"But the Democrats would have released the files!"
Epstein’s network implicated figures on both sides of the isle, including Democrats like Bill Clinton, not to mention powerful doners to both parties. Then of course there are the obvious ties to Israel that both parties seem perfectly happy to cover up even if it involves presidential assassinations, attacks on US Naval vessels, or mass casualty terror attacks.
The Epstein files released under Trump’s administration "Phase 1" were heavily redacted, with no new revelations. Trump's appointees claim they are having trouble even tracking down the files. Even if democrats wanted to go on an absurd suicide mission and torpedo the whole thing, implicating themselves and Israel, there's not even a clear indication of who would have had access to what.
The ruling class, even under Democratic administrations, prioritize institutional stability over releasing files that could implicate numerous elites, destabilizing public trust in the system. Continuity of power reigns supreme and always takes priority. If you don't understand this and look at politics like a football game, you're not going to make it.
This is not exhaustive and doesn't even include the endless ties (including familiar) Trump has to Jewish organized crime and the Israeli government. I've done a whole stream on that called "Trump and the Jews" you can find on Rumble, Odysee, and Bitchute.
Why is everyone so shocked that Trump's DoJ is doing to the Epstein files in 2025 what Trump's DoJ did to Epstein himself in 2019?
"thE deMocRAts WOulD HAVE ReLeaSED tHE blACkmAIl inFo On tRumP IF EpsTEin EVer Got aNY!"
Imagine thinking Epstein worked for the Democrats.
Imagine thinking the people he did work for aren't getting everything they want.
Imagine thinking Epstein worked for the Democrats.
Imagine thinking the people he did work for aren't getting everything they want.
🚨LIVE NOW🚨
INSOMNIA STREAM: MAGA BRAIN EDITION
Did the Epstein files kill themselves?
https://rumble.com/v6ug5r5-insomnia-stream-maga-brain-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp
INSOMNIA STREAM: MAGA BRAIN EDITION
Did the Epstein files kill themselves?
https://rumble.com/v6ug5r5-insomnia-stream-maga-brain-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp
Rumble
INSOMNIA STREAM: MAGA BRAIN EDITION
SUPPORT THE SHOW send superchats here: https://entropystream.live/app/DevonStack.com Catch streams LIVE on Odysee Subscribe on Odysee here: https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b BitChute: https://www.bitchute
Blackpilled pinned «🚨LIVE NOW🚨 INSOMNIA STREAM: MAGA BRAIN EDITION Did the Epstein files kill themselves? https://rumble.com/v6ug5r5-insomnia-stream-maga-brain-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp»