If the open doesn't start, click here
ุตูุฑ ๐ ุจูุงุช ๐ ุฑู ุฒูุงุช ๐ ุฌุฑูุฆุฉ ๐ ุฎูุฌูุงุช ๐ูุงููุงุช ๐ ุงูุณุชูุฑุงู ๐ ุณุชูุฑูุงุช ๐ ุงูุชุงุฑุงุช ๐ ุดุนุฑ ๐ ุบุฒู ๐ ุงูุนุฑุงู ๐ ูุฑูุจ ๐ ุงูุณุชุง Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, itโs always in relation to something bad. What gives? Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means itโs less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isnโt as secure earned it some criticism. If youโre looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFFโs preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
ุตูุฑ ๐ ุจูุงุช ๐ ุฑู ุฒูุงุช ๐ ุฌุฑูุฆุฉ ๐ ุฎูุฌูุงุช ๐ูุงููุงุช ๐ ุงูุณุชูุฑุงู ๐ ุณุชูุฑูุงุช ๐ ุงูุชุงุฑุงุช ๐ ุดุนุฑ ๐ ุบุฒู ๐ ุงูุนุฑุงู ๐ ูุฑูุจ ๐ ุงูุณุชุง from FR