💬 Постпред США при ОБСЕ о гибели военкора РИА Новости Ростислава Журавлева от украинского обстрела: мы осуждаем любые атаки на представителей прессы.
Во-первых, у «любых атак» есть имя и жертвы, и агрессора. Имя жертвы - Ростислав Журавлев. Имя агрессора - киевский режим. США не должны стесняться произносить эти имена вслух.
Во-вторых, нельзя одновременно осуждать атаки на журналистов и спонсировать тех, кто их совершает.
В данном случае США прямо спонсируют террористическую деятельность киевской шайки. Соответственно? Они никак не могут «осуждать атаки», производимые на их собственные средства.
💬 Постпред США при ОБСЕ о гибели военкора РИА Новости Ростислава Журавлева от украинского обстрела: мы осуждаем любые атаки на представителей прессы.
Во-первых, у «любых атак» есть имя и жертвы, и агрессора. Имя жертвы - Ростислав Журавлев. Имя агрессора - киевский режим. США не должны стесняться произносить эти имена вслух.
Во-вторых, нельзя одновременно осуждать атаки на журналистов и спонсировать тех, кто их совершает.
В данном случае США прямо спонсируют террористическую деятельность киевской шайки. Соответственно? Они никак не могут «осуждать атаки», производимые на их собственные средства.
As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea.
from fr
