📝 خلاصه تجمیع دو جلسه سخنرانی استاد رائفیپور با موضوع:
✅اربعین و هدف مشترک با امام زمان عجل الله تعالی فرجه الشریف 📅 ۲۱ و ۲۲ شهریور ۱۴۰۱ 📍عراق
🔺اربعین یک مانیفست برای عزت است. 🔺اربعین آمده است یاد بدهد که چطور با امامزمان باشیم. 🔺شرط همهدف شدن با امام معصوم چیست؟ 🔺چهچیزی عامل ایستادن مقابل امام معصوم است؟ 🔺وای بر من اگر امامحسین را دوست داشته باشم، ولی امامحسینیها را نه.
📝 خلاصه تجمیع دو جلسه سخنرانی استاد رائفیپور با موضوع:
✅اربعین و هدف مشترک با امام زمان عجل الله تعالی فرجه الشریف 📅 ۲۱ و ۲۲ شهریور ۱۴۰۱ 📍عراق
🔺اربعین یک مانیفست برای عزت است. 🔺اربعین آمده است یاد بدهد که چطور با امامزمان باشیم. 🔺شرط همهدف شدن با امام معصوم چیست؟ 🔺چهچیزی عامل ایستادن مقابل امام معصوم است؟ 🔺وای بر من اگر امامحسین را دوست داشته باشم، ولی امامحسینیها را نه.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from fr