Илекчане записали коллективное видео обращение к президенту РФ. Жители п.Переволоцкий, ни в чем не повинные дети стали заложниками ОПО "Триумф". Кто давал право на их уничтожение? С чьего молчаливого согласия происходит этот беспредел? Кто их обрек на такую жизнь?
Илекчане записали коллективное видео обращение к президенту РФ. Жители п.Переволоцкий, ни в чем не повинные дети стали заложниками ОПО "Триумф". Кто давал право на их уничтожение? С чьего молчаливого согласия происходит этот беспредел? Кто их обрек на такую жизнь?
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Ukrainian forces have since put up a strong resistance to the Russian troops amid the war that has left hundreds of Ukrainian civilians, including children, dead, according to the United Nations. Ukrainian and international officials have accused Russia of targeting civilian populations with shelling and bombardments. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from fr
