🔆 کد اختصاصی همایش در مؤسسه استنادی و پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام: ۰۳۲۴۰-۳۶۲۹۸
🏵 امتیاز شرکت در همایش:
🔷 گواهی معتبر شرکت و ارائه مقاله جهت تمامی شرکت کنندگان 🔶 برای دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد نجف آباد ۰/۵ امتیار تا سقف دو مقاله برای مقالات پوستری و ۱ امتیاز تا سقف دو مقاله برای مقالات سخنرانی 🔷 برای اعضای هیات علمی نجف آباد ۱/۵ امتیاز تا سقف ۲ امتیاز جهت ترفیع سالیانه
🔆 کد اختصاصی همایش در مؤسسه استنادی و پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام: ۰۳۲۴۰-۳۶۲۹۸
🏵 امتیاز شرکت در همایش:
🔷 گواهی معتبر شرکت و ارائه مقاله جهت تمامی شرکت کنندگان 🔶 برای دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد نجف آباد ۰/۵ امتیار تا سقف دو مقاله برای مقالات پوستری و ۱ امتیاز تا سقف دو مقاله برای مقالات سخنرانی 🔷 برای اعضای هیات علمی نجف آباد ۱/۵ امتیاز تا سقف ۲ امتیاز جهت ترفیع سالیانه
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from fr
