Целями атаки стали военные объекты в провинциях Латакия, Тартус, Хама и Хомс.
Ранее в ЦАХАЛ сообщили, что хотят уничтожить весь военный потенциал страны, а премьер Нетаньяху заявил, что "Голанские высоты навсегда останутся частью Израиля".
🔸Напомним, что Голаны считались территорией Сирии до победы Израиля в Войне Судного дня. Однако с 1973 года и до прошлой недели ЦАХАЛ не делал попыток захватить новые территории страны.
Целями атаки стали военные объекты в провинциях Латакия, Тартус, Хама и Хомс.
Ранее в ЦАХАЛ сообщили, что хотят уничтожить весь военный потенциал страны, а премьер Нетаньяху заявил, что "Голанские высоты навсегда останутся частью Израиля".
🔸Напомним, что Голаны считались территорией Сирии до победы Израиля в Войне Судного дня. Однако с 1973 года и до прошлой недели ЦАХАЛ не делал попыток захватить новые территории страны.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from fr
