Книжные ярмарки приходят и уходят, а котики остаются. Лариса Голубкина на съемках фильма Александра Птушко «Сказка о царе Салтане» в объективе фотографа журнала Life Дмитрия Кесселя. 1966. #история_кино_с_котиками
Книжные ярмарки приходят и уходят, а котики остаются. Лариса Голубкина на съемках фильма Александра Птушко «Сказка о царе Салтане» в объективе фотографа журнала Life Дмитрия Кесселя. 1966. #история_кино_с_котиками
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects.
from fr
