Ну что же - поиграем немножко в политологов, едва ли у нас получится хуже, чем у тех, кому за это деньги платят. А скорее и лучше. Мой прогноз на вторник такой. Победит Трамп, но победу нарисуют для Харрис. По схеме прошлого раза. Возможны опять протестные волнения. С силовым подавлением. Не настаиваю, что это единственно возможный вариант развития событий, но, на мой взгляд, весьма вероятный.
Ну что же - поиграем немножко в политологов, едва ли у нас получится хуже, чем у тех, кому за это деньги платят. А скорее и лучше. Мой прогноз на вторник такой. Победит Трамп, но победу нарисуют для Харрис. По схеме прошлого раза. Возможны опять протестные волнения. С силовым подавлением. Не настаиваю, что это единственно возможный вариант развития событий, но, на мой взгляд, весьма вероятный.
BY ALBALONGA с Еленой Чудиновой
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from fr
